Another Conservative pro-AV perspective courtesy of Platform 10 website

The Platform 10 website, “a platform for a wide-range of Conservative supporters, activists & commentators” has featured this article by Rene Kinzett as part of it’s discussion about the Alternative Vote & the referendum about whether to upgrade our elections to AV or stick with the current system of First Past the Post. While my own preference when debating & thinking about the ongoing campaign of “AV or FPTP” is to steer clear of party-political point scoring & to stick with the general benefits I believe AV brings for the vast majority of the voting public who aren’t diehard supporters of any particular party, it’s always good to see thoughtful arguments from a different political perspective.

While reminding us that AV need not spell out bad news at all electorally for a modern centre-right Conservative party, as borne out by research by Lord Ashcroft, Kinzett also mentions something rather unfair about last year’s general election- that (rather like Labour) Conservatives enjoyed a larger share of the seats than their overall share of the popular vote. (Conservatives won 47% of the seats with 36.1% of the vote).

Also noted is the fact that a form of AV is used in Conservative leadership elections, with mention that the contests of 1997, 2001 & 2005 would have all been quite different had they been ran using just FPTP: in ’97  Ken Clarke would have won instead of William Hague (maybe that’s why Clarke has stepped up as a No2AV figurehead!), the 2001 result would have seen Michael Portillo installed as leader rather than Iain Duncan Smith & in 2005 David Davis would have prevailed against David Cameron. As Kinzett continues:

“If we can see the benefits of AV for selecting Commons Committee Chairs and for our own internal Party elections, why can’t we comprehend the advantage for the wider electorate when they come to vote for their MPs?”

Kinzett then takes the perspective I’ve been waiting for from someone on the political right to do- the pro-choice angle, which Conservatives value highly in many other areas:

“Candidates campaigning against Labour incumbents from a third-place position have to endure countless bits of paper going through doors from the Liberal Democrats telling electors that a Tory vote would be a “wasted vote”. The instant run-off nature of AV allows electors to make a more sophisticated choice, expressing their support for the Party they support the most, then going on to make subsequent preferences which will only count if their first choice is “off the menu”, as it were. It is the ultimate “consumer is king” form of voting.”

I also fully agree with Rene Kinzett’s view that AV would increase the power that voters themselves wield, & that MPs that have previously won with less than 50% of the vote will probably have to build a dialogue with those who’ve voted for minority candidates & certainly won’t be able to ignore the majority who didn’t vote for them as easily as they used to, especially if that MP wants to keep hold of their seat!

You can read the full article here, & the No2AV case in the discussion is put by Phil Cane here, which we may deconstruct soon, though other Yes campaigners do that so much better than me!

This entry was posted in AV in the News and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Another Conservative pro-AV perspective courtesy of Platform 10 website

  1. Rene Kinzett says:

    Many thanks for a very kind review of my blog post re “The Conservative Case for AV”. I have to admit I am not a natural supporter of AV and would have preferred to see STV or even AV+ on the menu of choices for reform…but we are where we are and AV is infinitely more preferable IMHO than FPTP. Keep up the good work!

  2. On a personal level I too think more choice of voting systems in this referendum would have been a fairer & more open way to proceed, probably with some form of public consultation to make voters more aware of the various options & possibly a 2-question referendum of “Do you want to change the current voting system?” followed by “If we do change the voting system, which would be your preferred option?”.

    If we are to keep single MP constituencies for the House of Commons then AV is a much better system for electing them than FPTP, which recognises that we don’t live in a strict 2-party political system any more.

    Cheers for the supportive message too!

  3. Pingback: Tweets that mention Another Conservative pro-AV perspective courtesy of Platform 10 website | Yes to Fairer Votes – Birmingham --

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s